CCIE R&S LAB is still stable before changing the question

TS1

1. SW2 creates VLAN 12

2. R17 S4 / 0 no ppp authentication chap callout

3. R22 no ip os cost (two phenomena in the test room, the less common one is show ip route x.x.x.x, one route is

Marked by *, at the beginning my phenomenon and phenomenon diagram are not the same, I put the opposite interface of R1 and R3 or R5 shut / no shut to be the same

Up)

4. R11,12,13,14: metric weights 0 1 1 1 1 1

    R12 no delay

5. R12 max 2

6. R22 route-map changes the IPv6 next hop address

7. a. R18,19 tun port NHRP configuration error,

b. R15 no ip split-horizon eigrp 200

c. The phenomenon graph is User1spoke2, U is uppercase, and the trace directly on the device is lowercase. I deleted the ip domain time 1 of R15, and it became uppercase. (Actually, I feel this is not the wrong point, but many battle reports have been changed this way, so I have changed it)

8. a. The RT values of R3 and R4 are not

 b. During the backup link test, R6 and R4 have problems. Pass one of the devices to the passive interface of the ospf process.

 Off, force R6-R4 to go MPLS

9. R7, R24 One of the devices is missing the group 14

10. Wrong DHCP binding address for R23

DIAG 1+

Interference in dragging

 1. R1 evaluates input features(ACL,Netflow)for interface E0/1. (The interference item of this option is E0 / 2, and the E0 / 1 option that is directly connected to host1 should be selected.)

 2. R1 determines that there are multiple egress paths.

 3. R1 selects only one path,using the per-destination load-balancing algorithm.

 4. R1 determines that there is only one egress path

 5. R1 selects the adjacency out of interface E2/0 and realizes that the packet must be

translated.

 6. R1 translates the source ip address to 11.11.11.11 and transmits the packet via interface E2/0

 7. R3 receives the packet and evaluates input features(ACL,Netfolw)

 8. R3 drops the packet due to strict unicast reverse path forwarding

LAB 3

1. Each area has a table of which interfaces are in which VLAN. Many of them lack sw mo access. It is recommended not to check them one by one. According to the chart, int range ...... sw mo access is configured quickly instead.

2. SW300 / 301 is pre-configured with no spanning-tree mst simulate pvst global.

3. Router-ID has a lot of pre-configuration, I encountered 65004 and 65005 ospf and bgp are not configured.

4. DHCP ipv6, e0 / 0 of server1 is configured with ipv6 enable and ipv6 nd autoconfig. Is not equipped with ipv6 address DHCP (supplemented)

5. I should have lost the characteristics of 4.1. In addition to the 2 requirements on the picture, there is a third requirement that the policy name cannot be called NA. Ip policy name must called be else than “NA” I shouldn’t pay attention to this need. Later I saw a long time of reflection. I didn’t pass the English level and changed the name to NA.

6. 5.1 Features After writing the small program, it should be exited from the current configuration process to take effect. I directly show run | se eve under the current process, and re-configured one after restart. Similar to configuring the vlan and exiting the vlan process, the vlan can be officially created.

7. Anyway, according to the solution of multicast, it is impossible to perfectly match these two phenomena.

8. The LAN-TO-LAN problem has two phenomenon diagrams, one is trace, and the other is show crypto session. As long as the phenomenon diagram is completed, there is no problem. The only thing to note is that the stream of interest is 24-bit, because show When there is a mask on it, it needs to be the same.

Comments

The time difference between India and China was about 2 hours. The doorman was released to building11 at about 8 o'clock, and the visitor registered at the front desk to issue a visitor's card. TS1 has fewer mistakes. Usually, routine mistakes can be done in half an hour. The test room environment has just adapted, plus more questions and more inspections. It took an hour to complete the inspections. The diagnosis was uncontroversial for half an hour.

The version started at about 10:30. Don't like LAB 3 because there are many commands. The keyboard is unfeeling, and the show command plus the pipe character 10 was typed incorrectly 8 times. In addition, the real test depends on the question, and it will be completed at about 2:30. During the period, I looked at the question directly, and then I could n’t directly verify the phenomenon. After I finished all the questions, I started to verify the phenomenon slowly. In short, the way is very smooth. After the verification is completed, the phenomenon is directly out in seconds. The update of the routing table between the active and standby routes is also much faster than usual practice. Usually, many devices must be soft-cleaned to have a phenomenon.

After checking for almost 2 hours, I didn't find any mistakes. I feel pretty ridiculous, because usually there is a little bit wrong when compared to the configuration time.

There are about 15 candidates on the 20th. There are a lot of other directions. The Indian examination room is very loose and loose. The examiner is either absent, talking on the phone, or chatting with a colleague, so there is nothing wrong with you. I submitted the papers and the examiner was not yet seated. I waited for 20 minutes and said hello to him to see if there was anything to explain.

All in all, I believe PASSHOT is definitely right! They can definitely help you pass the ccie r&s exam!

PS: The keyboard and mouse of the test room are definitely not suitable for most candidates, so it is recommended to use shift + insert key combination when closing the command in the test room to close the window: alt + F4 (close the window directly)